Skip navigation

Tag Archives: Health Care

By: Meredith Cohn, Andrea Walker. The Baltimore Sun

MD Health Care Services Cost Commission: – The state’s unique rate-setting system.

Maryland’s system, launched in the 1970s, aims to hold down costs by spreading the expense of patient care. All insurers, including private companies, the state, through Medicaid, and the federal government, via Medicare, pay the same rates. Maryland is the only state in the country with such a rate-setting program.

The system has been praised for holding down costs and spreading them equitably, but it also poses problems. Hospitals, insurance companies and the commission agree that it has become antiquated and needs to be updated.

The system also means Medicare pays higher rates in Maryland than elsewhere. Medicare officials imposed a test to maintain a waiver for the program. The state needs to ensure the increase in patient care costs doesn’t exceed the increase for Medicare patients nationally.

By Steve Kilar, The Baltimore Sun

The Maryland medical society and attorney general’s office launched a website Saturday aimed at helping doctors file complaints with the state when insurance companies refuse to cover patient care.

The site, called Insurance Watch, is hosted on the Internet by the medical society. Its primary purpose is to allow doctors to more easily “help patients when legitimate health insurance claims have been denied,” according to the attorney general’s office. But it also contains information for patients about filing insurance complaints on their own and allows MedChi to track doctors’ complaints.

Patients often think it’s their doctor’s fault that an insurance claim was denied, Gansler said. For that reason, he said, many patients go straight to their doctor if they have an insurance complaint.

In addition to acting as a one-stop shop for patients and doctors to find online forms for filing complaints with the attorney general or state insurance commissioner, the site includes a form that allows doctors to notify MedChi about each insurance complaint they file.

The medical society can then follow up with the attorney general’s office to facilitate the gathering of information about the complaint, said Meredith Borden, deputy director of the attorney general’s health education and advocacy unit.

In large part, the site is intended to raise awareness among doctors that they “have a right under Maryland law to file complaints on their patients’ behalf,” Borden said. Both doctors and patients benefit financially when insurance claims are paid properly, she said.

Consumers can file complaints and find more insurance-related resources on the Insurance Watch site, http://www.medchi.org/iwatch/medchinew.html

By Reuters

U.S. regulators gave the nod to an imaging test from Eli Lilly and Co. that can for the first time help doctors detect brain plaque tied to Alzheimer’s disease, the company said.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the radioactive dye, called Amyvid, to help doctors rule out whether patients have Alzheimer’s.

The dye binds to clumps of a toxic protein called beta amyloid that accumulates in the brains of patients with Alzheimer’s. Doctors can then see the plaque light up on a positron emission tomography, or PET, scan.

Patients with Alzheimer’s always have some brain plaque, so its absence in the test would tell doctors to look for other causes of mental decline, such as depression or medications, Lilly has said.

But Lilly, which plans to sell the drug through its unit Avid Radiopharmaceuticals Inc, said the test should not be used to diagnose Alzheimer’s, since brain plaque can also be tied to other neurologic conditions and may occur naturally in older people with normal mental states.

An FDA advisory panel recommended against approving the dye last year, saying doctors might have trouble interpreting scans of the plaque, and the FDA rejected Amyvid last March.

Since then, Eli Lilly said it has worked to identify better ways of training doctors to use the test.

Dr. Daniel Skovronsky, CEO of Avid, said one in five patients who are diagnosed with Alzheimer’s turn out not to have the disease after an autopsy.

“The approval of Amyvid offers physicians a tool that, in conjunction with other diagnostic evaluations, can provide information to help physicians evaluate their patients,” he said in the company’s statement from Friday.

There is currently no cure for Alzheimer’s, a mind-robbing disease that affects more than 35 million people worldwide and gets worse with age.

But an early hint that something is wrong might improve the success of drugs meant to prevent or delay disease progression, researchers believe.

By Meredith Cohn, The Baltimore Sun
 
Many women became used to having a Pap smear annually to check for cervical cancer, but recent recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force have updated the timeline. Now, most women will need the test every five years. Cancer experts now agree that that this can fully protect women, while cutting down on costs, false positive test results and side effects, said Dr. Amanda Nickles Fader, assistant professor of gynecologic oncology at the Greater Baltimore Medical Center.

Question: What do the new recommendations say about Pap smear/cervical cancer screening?

Answer: Previously, the Pap smear, a cervical cancer screening test, was recommended every 1-3 years. New recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force state that women who are under the age of 21 do not need a Pap smear at all, regardless of sexual history; healthy women who are 21 to 29 years old only need a Pap smear once every three years; and healthy women between the ages of 30 and 65 need a Pap smear only once every five years if they combine it with a test for human papillomavirus, or HPV (a sexually transmitted infection and the leading cause of cervical cancer). The guidelines are completely in line with the recommendations of the American Cancer Society and other medical organizations.

Q: In healthy women who’ve never had an abnormal pap smear, why can they now have this done once every 3-5 years?

A: There are three reasons. The first is that cervical cancer develops very slowly, over a period of 7-20 years. A cancer is unlikely to be missed between 3-5 year screenings in a woman whose previous Pap smear results were normal. Second, Pap smear technology is much better now than a decade ago, and therefore, much more sensitive in its ability to detect cervical abnormalities. Addition of the HPV co-test to the Pap smear has further increased the sensitivity of cervical cancer screening. So with better, more sensitive screening tests, it is safe for healthy women to undergo fewer tests overall without compromising their health.

Q: How effective a diagnostic tool has the Pap smear test been historically?

A: The Pap smear is the single most effective and successful cancer screening test in history, and many other screening tests used in medicine are modeled after it.  the Pap smear does not need to be performed annually to be effective.

Q: Is there a concern that women may develop cervical cancer and have it go unnoticed/untreated in between regular exams?

A: The leading cause of cervical cancer is infection with HPV. Most women who are exposed to HPV will not develop cervical cancer, but a percentage will develop precancerous changes or invasive cancer. Because the interval between HPV infection and development of cervical cancer may take years, it is unlikely that a healthy woman with a previously normal Pap smear will develop a cancer between screenings. However, if a woman develops persistent irregular vaginal bleeding, especially after sexual intercourse, or unexplained vaginal discharge or pelvic pain between gynecology visits, she should consult with her physician sooner, as these may be signs of a cervical abnormality or female cancer.

Q: Does this mean women now don’t have to go for yearly GYN exams?

A: Screening for cervical cancer with the Pap smear is very important but is only one aspect of women’s health. Although the new guidelines recommend Pap smear screening once every 3-5 years in healthy females, women are still encouraged to see their gynecologist or primary care provider on an annual basis for breast care, pelvic exams and general and women’s health issues.

Q: Why are the new recommendations a good thing for women’s health?

A: The new guidelines represent a significant step forward for women’s health. Major breakthroughs in our understanding of HPV and its role in cervical cancer as well as advances in Pap smear technology have revolutionized the approach to cervical cancer screening. Fewer Pap smears performed in conjunction with HPV testing will detect the same number of cancers as before but with the added benefit of decreased health care costs for women and reduction in the risk of false positive results, which may lead to unnecessary and painful biopsies, cervical procedures, and an increased risk of infection, infertility, risks to future pregnancies and stress for women. The best protection against development of cervical cancer is to continue Pap smear screening according to the new guidelines and to prevent HPV infection through safe sex practices and HPV vaccination. But not all women will be candidates for screening every 3-5 years, so I encourage women to consult with their physicians regarding these new guidelines to determine what screening interval will be best for them.

To learn more about overuse or misuse of medical tests and procedures that provide little or no benefit and, in some cases, cause harm, go to choosingwisely.org.

• To find information about how to talk to your doctor and ask questions about tests and procedures, go to consumerreports.org.

By: msnbc.com

FAQ about some of the law’s provisions that are already in place as well as major features of what’s to come, if the law stays in place.

Q: I don’t have health insurance. Will I have to buy it and what happens if I don’t?

A: Right now, you are not required to have health insurance. But beginning in 2014, most people will have to have it or pay a fine. For individuals, the penalty would start at $95 a year, or up to 1 percent of income, whichever is greater, and rise to $695, or 2.5 percent of income, by 2016.

For families the penalty would be $2,085 or 2.5 percent of household income, whichever is greater by 2016 and beyond. The requirement to have coverage, known as the individual mandate, can be waived for several reasons, including financial hardship or religious beliefs.

Millions of additional people will qualify for Medicaid or federal subsidies to buy insurance under the law.

Q: I get my health coverage at work and I’d like to keep my current plan. Will I be able to do that? How will my plan be affected by the health law?

A: If you get insurance through your job, it is likely to stay that way. But, just as before the law was passed, your employer is not obligated to keep the current plan and may change premiums, deductibles, co-pays and network coverage.

You may have seen some law-related changes already. For example, most plans now ban lifetime coverage limits  and include a guarantee that an adult child up to age 26  who can’t get health insurance at a job can stay on her parents’ health plan.

Q: What are some other parts of the law that are now in place?

A: You are likely to be eligible for preventive services with no out-of-pocket costs, such as breast cancer screenings and cholesterol tests.

Health plans can’t cancel your coverage once you get sick — a practice known as “rescission” — unless you committed fraud when you applied for coverage.

Children with pre-existing conditions cannot be denied coverage (this will apply to adults in 2014).
Insurers will have to provide rebates to consumers if they spend less than 80 to 85 percent of premium dollars on medical care.

Some existing plans, if they haven’t changed significantly since passage of the law, do not have to abide by certain parts of the law. For example, these “grandfathered” plans  can still charge beneficiaries part of the cost for preventive services.

If you’re currently in one of these plans, and your employer makes significant changes, such as raising your out-of-pocket costs, the plan would then have to abide by all aspects of the health law.

Q: I want health insurance but I can’t afford it. What will I do?

A: Depending on your income, you might be eligible for Medicaid, the state-federal program for the poor and disabled. Currently, in most states nonelderly adults without minor children don’t qualify for Medicaid. But beginning in 2014, anyone with an income at or lower than 133 percent of the federal poverty level, (which currently would be $14,856 for an individual or $30,656 for a family of four) will be eligible for Medicaid (based on current poverty guidelines).

Q: What if I make too much money for Medicaid but still can’t afford to buy insurance?

A: You might be eligible for government subsidies to help you pay for private insurance sold in the state-based insurance marketplaces, called exchanges, slated to begin operation in 2014. Exchanges will sell insurance plans to individuals and small businesses.

These premium subsidies will be available for individuals and families with incomes between 133 percent and 400 percent of the poverty level, or $14,856 to $44,680 for individuals and $30,656 to $92,200 for a family of four (based on current poverty guidelines).

Q: Will it be easier for me to get coverage even if I have health problems?

A: Insurers will be barred from rejecting applicants based on health status once the exchanges are operating in 2014.

Q: I own a small business. Will I have to buy health insurance for my workers?

A: No employer is required to provide insurance. But starting in 2014, businesses with 50 or more employees that don’t provide health care coverage and have at least one full-time worker who receives subsidized coverage in the health insurance exchange will have to pay a fee of up to $2,000 per full-time employee. The firm’s first 30 workers would be excluded from the fee.

However, if you have a firm with 50 or fewer people you won’t face any penalties.

In addition, if you own a small business, the health law offers a tax credit to help cover the cost. Employers with 25 or fewer full-time workers who earn an average yearly salary of $50,000 or less today can get tax credits of up 35 percent of the cost of premiums. The credit increases to 50 percent in 2014.

Q: I’m over 65. How does the legislation affect seniors?

A: The law is narrowing a gap in the Medicare Part D prescription drug plan known as the “doughnut hole.” That’s when seniors who have paid a certain initial amount in prescription costs have to pay for all of their drug costs until they spend a total of $4,700 for the year. Then the plan coverage begins again.
That coverage gap will be closed entirely by 2020. Seniors will still be responsible for 25 percent of their prescription drug costs.

The law also has expanded Medicare’s coverage of preventive services, such as screenings for colon, prostate and breast cancer, which are now free to beneficiaries. Medicare will also pay for an annual wellness visit to the doctor.

The federal government’s payments to Medicare Advantage plans, run by private insurers as an alternative to the traditional Medicare, were cut in 2011 and will continue to be reduced in future years. Medicare Advantage costs more per beneficiary than traditional Medicare. Critics of those payment cuts say that could mean the private plans may not offer many extra benefits, such as free eyeglasses, hearing aids and gym memberships that they now provide.

Q: Will I have to pay more for my health care because of the law?

A: No one knows for sure. Even supporters of the law acknowledge its steps to control health costs, such as incentives to coordinate care better, may take a while to show significant savings. Opponents say the law’s additional coverage requirements will make health insurance more expensive for individuals and for the government.

That said, there are some new taxes and fees. For example, starting in 2013, individual with earnings above $200,000 and married couples making more than $250,000 will pay a Medicare payroll tax of 2.35 percent, up from the current 1.45 percent, on income over those thresholds. In addition, higher-income people will face a 3.8 percent tax on unearned income, such as dividends and interest.

Starting in 2018, the law will also impose a 40 percent excise tax on the portion of most employer-sponsored health coverage (excluding dental and vision) that exceeds $10,200 a year and $27,500 for families. The tax has been dubbed a “Cadillac” tax because it hits the most generous plans.

Q. Has the law hit some bumps in the road?

A: Like any major piece of legislation, some aspects have not worked out as well as its authors intended.
For example, the law created high-risk insurance pools to help people purchase health insurance. But enrollment in the pools has been less than expected. In February, the Obama administration announced that almost 50,000 people had signed up for the high-risk pools, but the program, which began in June 2009, was initially expected to enroll between 200,000 to 400,000 people. The cost and the requirements have been difficult for some to meet.

For example, applicants must be uninsured for six months because of a pre-existing medical condition before they can join a pool. And because participants are sicker than the general population, the premiums are higher.

http://www.marylandhealthinsuranceplan.state.md.us/

MHIP health insurance is available to Maryland residents who are unable to get the coverage they need due to a pre-existing health condition, or those who have an automatic qualifying health condition. MHIP also welcomes individuals who have exhausted their employer-sponsored coverage and any right to continuation of that coverage. Under the two plans, MHIP Standard and MHIP Federal, there are many options to choose from. Applicants with low to moderate income may be eligible for reduced premiums and cost sharing through the MHIP+ or MHIP Federal+ options

Maryland Health Insurance Plan is for pre-existing conditions.  The state program, which includes the federally supported plan and a state-supported one, is expected to enroll thousands more of Maryland’s 720,000 uninsured — two years before federal health care reform mandates exchanges in every state for the uninsured to buy private insurance.

An $85 million federal subsidy is offsetting the cost of the federal plan created in 2010 under the health care reform law. A tax on hospitals in Maryland subsidizes the state plan, opened in 2003.

Maryland Health Insurance Plan is the agency that administers both plans.

The federal program is available only to individuals, while the state plan allows families.

There are other differences as well. The federal program requires applicants to have been uninsured for six months, while the state plan has no waiting period. The state plan, however, only covers medical needs that aren’t related to pre-existing conditions for the first six months.

The programs can’t be combined because they have different funding sources, but the state saves money by managing them jointly, McKinney said. CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield administers both.

Premiums in the federal plan run from $127 to $354 for a high-deductible plan and $246 to $685 for a regular plan.

By Andrea Stone, AOL.com

Insurance companies will have to spend 80 to 85 percent of consumers’ premiums on direct patient care or send a rebate if they don’t, under long-awaited rules issued today that were passed as part of the Obama administration’s health care law.

The 308 pages of regulations on what is known as the “medical loss ratio” may be technical, but Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius called them “an important step to hold insurance companies accountable and increase value for consumers.”

The new regulations, which take effect in January and will require companies to issue annual reports to HHS, require companies to spend at least 80 percent of premiums delivering health care to consumers. In employer plans that cover more than 50 people, insurers would have to spend 85 cents of every premium dollar on medical care and efforts to improve health care quality.

Companies that fail to meet those guidelines will have to provide rebates to customers starting in 2012.

The rules were developed with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, which represents state insurance regulators.

By Reuters

Many doctors and other health care workers require that women have pelvic exams before they can get prescriptions for birth control pills, despite guidelines saying that the step is unnecessary, a new study finds.

Drinking glasses depicting comic book and movie characters exceed federal limits for lead in children’s products by up to 1,000 times, according to laboratory tests.

 

An even higher percentage — 44 percent — said they “usually” required one, according to findings published in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology.

The number of practitioners requiring a pelvic exam is disappointingly high, researchers say, considering the fact that the World Health Organization and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) advise that birth control pills can safely be prescribed without the exam.

Unnecessary hurdle
The key problem with mandatory pelvic exams is that it puts up an unnecessary hurdle to women seeking effective birth control, according to Sawaya and his colleagues at the University of California, San Francisco.

Women have to wait until their provider can fit the exam into his or her schedule; some may be turned off by the requirement altogether and opt for less-reliable forms of contraception, like condoms.

“In my view, we should have as few barriers as possible to women trying to get effective birth control,” Sawaya said.

Pelvic exams should not be linked to oral contraception in a mandated fashion.

There is no established medical need for women to have the exam before receiving a prescription for birth control pills, Sawaya said. It’s just that, traditionally, pelvic exams have been coupled with contraceptive prescriptions; in many cases, it may have simply been convenient for women to have a pelvic exam as part of their routine healthcare at the same time they were seeking a birth-control prescription.

“The two just became linked,” Kaunitz agreed. But while there is nothing wrong with that, he said, “women also deserve the option of un-linking those two services.”

Nurses least likely to require exams
Advanced-practice nurses specializing in women’s health were the least likely to require a pelvic exam, with 16 percent saying they always did so. In contrast, nurses specializing in family medicine were more likely than all other providers to always require a pelvic exam; 45 percent said they did.

The reasons for the high rates are not clear from the study. But simple tradition could be at work, according to both Sawaya and Kaunitz. “I think old habits die hard,” Kaunitz said.

It’s also possible that some doctors require a pelvic exam in order to get the insurance reimbursement, Sawaya and his colleagues note in their report.

Medicare pays doctors about $75 for a screening pelvic exam and, depending on geography, private insurers may pay more. Contraceptive counseling, on the other hand, may not always fall into a clearly defined reimbursement category, the authors note.

“In the absence of adequate financial incentives for contraceptive counseling as an important clinical activity in its own right,” the researchers write, “providers are incentivized to conduct a physical exam with a well-reimbursed billing code.

Exams raise risks of more unnecessary tests
Along with added costs, unneeded pelvic exams also open women up to the possibility of having an abnormal finding that, upon further testing, turns out to be nothing. “Any (test) we do with an asymptomatic person has a chance of resulting in a false-positive,” Sawaya pointed out.

As for how often women should have a routine pelvic exam in the absence of any problems, there is no specific guideline. There are guidelines, however, for how often women should get a Pap test to screen for cervical cancer, which is often done in conjunction with a pelvic exam.

According to ACOG, women should begin having Pap tests at age 21, with screening repeated every two years until age 30. Women age 30 and older who have had three consecutive negative Pap tests can be screened every three years.

For women who are only seeking a birth control prescription and are told they need to schedule a pelvic exam, Sawaya suggested they ask their provider why the exam is necessary.

But he said the real message of the survey results is for practitioners, who, based on these findings, need better awareness of current guidelines on birth control prescription.

Copyright 2010 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

 Discuss: Women seeking birth control get unneeded pelvic exams

3 total comments

A third of providers always require tests, raising costs, hurdles to contraception

By Emily Mullin, Baltimore Business Journal

Maryland’s new health information exchange is officially up and running.

The first medical facilities to come online are in Montgomery County.

The exchange is expected to include all Maryland hospitals by 2012, and 48 Maryland hospitals have already committed to participating in the exchange.

The Chesapeake Regional Information System for our Patients (CRISP) developed the exchange, which links hospitals across the state and enables medical recording sharing. Physician practices, hospitals, clinics, labs, radiology centers, and other health care institutions will be able to share information quickly via a computer system.

CRISP has won millions in federal grants for the project and $10 million from hospital rate payments as initial funding.

The exchange is an effort by the state to help health care providers adopt electronic health records and keep health care costs down by eliminating paper records.

Organizations now participating in the exchange include:

Holy Cross Hospital in Silver Spring

Suburban Hospital in Bethesda

Montgomery General Hospital in Olney

Quest Diagnostics

• Laboratory Corp. of America (LabCorp)

American Radiology Services